AdvertiseGB · GBP
tech21two-way radios, compared
  1. tech21
  2. Compare
  3. PoC-AT1 vs PoC 1300

Alervites PoC-AT1 vs PNI PoC 1300

What PoC-AT1 does better (1) and where PoC 1300 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Alervites PoC-AT1
Alervites · 2026PoC-AT1
1 advantage≈ £110
vs
PNI PoC 1300
PNI · 2026PoC 1300
1 advantage≈ £75
3.8Battery8.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

PoC-AT1PoC 1300
155 × 501655 × 35110
PoC-AT1PoC 1300Difference
Height50 mm35 mm+15 mm
Width155 mm55 mm+100 mm
Depth16 mm110 mm−94 mm
Weight120 g230 g−110 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is PoC-AT1 better than PoC 1300?

  1. Weight120 g vs 230 g+92%

Why is PoC 1300 better than PoC-AT1?

  1. Battery capacity2,200 mAh vs 4,400 mAh2×
Specifications

Side by side

PNI PoC 1300PNI PoC 1300≈ £75
Radio & range
Radio standardsPoC / LTEPoC / LTE
LicenceNeeds mobile data (SIM)Needs mobile data (SIM)
Push-to-talk over cellular (PoC)YesYes
Power & battery
Battery capacity2,200 mAh4,400 mAh
Battery voltage—3.7 V
Power sourceRechargeable packRechargeable pack
USB-C chargingYesYes
Standby time96 h—
Battery level indicatorYesYes
Design & durability
Weight120 g230 g
Width155 mm55 mm
Height50 mm35 mm
Depth16 mm110 mm
DisplayBacklit displayBacklit display
ColoursGreyBlack
Features
GPS—Yes
PC programmable—Yes
Connectivity
Headset / earpiece jackYesYes
ConnectorsUSB-C, 3,5mm KlinkeUSB-C, 2,5 und 3,5 mm
LTE / 4GYesYes
Radios in the base pack2—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare