AdvertiseGB · GBP
tech21two-way radios, compared
  1. tech21
  2. Compare
  3. BF-E50 vs RT-S10

Baofeng BF-E50 vs Radtel RT-S10

What BF-E50 does better (1) and where RT-S10 wins (4) — every spec side by side.

Baofeng BF-E50
Baofeng · 2026BF-E50
7.5Score
1 advantage≈ £60
vs
Radtel RT-S10
Radtel · 2026RT-S10
8.6Score
4 advantages≈ £60
Higher score
5.6Range & power6.8
7.5Battery7.8

Why is BF-E50 better than RT-S10?

  1. Battery capacity3,800 mAh vs 2,500 mAh+52%

Why is RT-S10 better than BF-E50?

  1. USB-C chargingNo · BF-E50: Yes
  2. Transmit power8 W vs 10 W+25%
  3. Channels16 vs 19912.4×
  4. DisplayNo display vs Colour display
Specifications

Side by side

Baofeng BF-E50Baofeng BF-E50≈ £607.5
Radtel RT-S10Radtel RT-S10≈ £608.6
Radio & range
Radio standardsAmateurVHF, UHF
LicenceAmateur licenceAmateur licence
Digital mode (DMR / dPMR)—Yes
Dual band (VHF + UHF)—Yes
Frequency ranges—136–174 MHz, 400–480 MHz, 76–108 MHz, 108–136 MHz
Transmit power8 W10 W
Channels16199
CTCSS / DCS sub-tonesYesYes
Squelchadjustable—
Power & battery
Battery capacity3,800 mAh2,500 mAh
Power sourceRechargeable pack—
USB-C chargingNoYes
Battery level indicatorYes—
Design & durability
Protection rating—IP67
Water protection (IPx)—IPx7
DisplayNo displayColour display
ColoursBlack—
Features
VOX (hands-free)YesYes
Channel scanYesYes
Dual watch—Yes
Emergency / SOS alarm—Yes
FM radio—Yes
Monitor buttonYesYes
Noise reduction—Yes
PC programmableYesYes
Connectivity
Headset / earpiece jackYes—
Connectors2,5 und 3,5 mm—
Bluetooth—Yes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare