AdvertiseGB · GBP
tech21two-way radios, compared
  1. tech21
  2. Compare
  3. C3 Pro vs RT-900 BT

Baofeng C3 Pro vs Radtel RT-900 BT

What C3 Pro does better (0) and where RT-900 BT wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Baofeng C3 Pro
Baofeng · 2026C3 Pro
3.8Score
0 advantages≈ £18
Higher score
vs
Radtel RT-900 BT
Radtel · 2025RT-900 BT
2 advantages≈ £30
2.3Range & power6.9

Why is C3 Pro better than RT-900 BT?

C3 Pro has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is RT-900 BT better than C3 Pro?

  1. Transmit power2 W vs 8 W4×
  2. Channels16 vs 25616×
Specifications

Side by side

Baofeng C3 ProBaofeng C3 Pro≈ £183.8
Radio & range
Radio standardsAmateur UHF—
LicenceAmateur licenceAmateur licence
Frequency ranges400 - 470 MHz65–108 MHz, 108–136 MHz, 136–260 MHz, 260–330 MHz
Transmit power2 W8 W
Channels16256
Maximum range (claimed)6 km—
Power & battery
Battery capacity1,500 mAh—
Battery voltage3.7 V—
Power sourceRechargeable pack—
USB-C chargingYes—
Battery level indicatorYes—
Design & durability
Weight175 g—
Width125 mm—
Height60 mm—
Depth30 mm—
DisplayNo display—
ColoursBlack—
Features
Channel scan—Yes
FlashlightYes—
Weather channels / alerts—Yes
FM radio—Yes
PC programmableYesYes
Connectivity
Headset / earpiece jackYes—
ConnectorsUSB-C, 2,5 und 3,5 mm—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare