AdvertiseGB · GBP
tech21two-way radios, compared
  1. tech21
  2. Compare
  3. DM-32E vs RA89

Baofeng DM-32E vs Retevis RA89

What DM-32E does better (0) and where RA89 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Baofeng DM-32E
Baofeng · 2025DM-32E
6.8Score
0 advantages≈ £80
vs
Retevis RA89
Retevis · 2025RA89
9.1Score
2 advantages≈ £60
Higher score
4.2Range & power7.4
7.8Battery7.8
6.0Features6.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

DM-32ERA89
182 × 6741126 × 6243
DM-32ERA89Difference
Height67 mm62 mm+5 mm
Width182 mm126 mm+56 mm
Depth41 mm43 mm−2 mm
Weight350 g295 g+55 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is DM-32E better than RA89?

DM-32E has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is RA89 better than DM-32E?

  1. Transmit power5 W vs 10 W2×
  2. Weight350 g vs 295 g+19%
Specifications

Side by side

Baofeng DM-32EBaofeng DM-32E≈ £806.8
Retevis RA89Retevis RA89≈ £609.1
Radio & range
Radio standardsAmateur VHF, Amateur UHFAmateur VHF, Amateur UHF
LicenceAmateur licenceAmateur licence
Dual band (VHF + UHF)YesYes
Frequency ranges430 - 440 MHz; 144 - 146 MHz430 - 440 MHz; 144 - 146 MHz
Transmit power5 W10 W
Channels—200
CTCSS / DCS sub-tonesYes—
Power & battery
Battery capacity2,500 mAh2,500 mAh
Battery voltage7.4 V7.4 V
Power sourceRechargeable packRechargeable pack
USB-C chargingYesYes
Battery level indicatorYesYes
Design & durability
Weight350 g295 g
Width182 mm126 mm
Height67 mm62 mm
Depth41 mm43 mm
Protection rating—IP68
Water protection (IPx)—IPx8
ShockproofYesYes
DisplayBacklit displayBacklit display
ColoursGreenBlack
Features
VOX (hands-free)YesYes
Channel scanYesYes
Dual watchYes—
Flashlight—Yes
FM radioYesYes
Monitor buttonYes—
GPSYes—
PC programmable—Yes
Connectivity
Headset / earpiece jackYesYes
ConnectorsUSB-C, 2,5 und 3,5 mmUSB-C, 2,5 und 3,5 mm
Radios in the base pack1—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare