AdvertiseGB · GBP
tech21two-way radios, compared
  1. tech21
  2. Compare
  3. Mirkit MK3 vs UV-K6

Baofeng Mirkit MK3 vs Quansheng UV-K6

What Mirkit MK3 does better (2) and where UV-K6 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Baofeng Mirkit MK3
Baofeng · 2025Mirkit MK3
5.2Score
2 advantages≈ £45
Higher score
vs
Quansheng UV-K6
Quansheng · 2025UV-K6
5.0Score
2 advantages≈ £40
6.1Range & power5.3
3.0Battery4.8

Why is Mirkit MK3 better than UV-K6?

  1. Maximum range (claimed)10 km vs 8 km+25%
  2. Battery capacity1,800 mAh vs 1,600 mAh+12%

Why is UV-K6 better than Mirkit MK3?

  1. USB-C chargingNo · Mirkit MK3: Yes
  2. Channels128 vs 200+56%
Specifications

Side by side

Quansheng UV-K6Quansheng UV-K6≈ £405.0
Radio & range
Radio standardsAmateur VHF, Amateur UHFAmateur VHF, Amateur UHF
LicenceAmateur licenceAmateur licence
Dual band (VHF + UHF)YesYes
Frequency ranges400 - 470 MHz; 136 - 174 MHz430 - 440 MHz; 144 - 146 MHz
Transmit power5 W5 W
Channels128200
Maximum range (claimed)10 km8 km
CTCSS / DCS sub-tones—Yes
Squelchadjustable—
Power & battery
Battery capacity1,800 mAh1,600 mAh
Battery voltage7.4 V—
Power sourceRechargeable packRechargeable pack
USB-C chargingNoYes
Battery level indicatorYesYes
Design & durability
Weight140 g—
DisplayBacklit displayBacklit display
ColoursBlackOrange
Features
VOX (hands-free)YesYes
Channel scanYes—
Flashlight—Yes
Emergency / SOS alarmYes—
Key lockYes—
Roger beepYes—
Monitor buttonYes—
Connectivity
Headset / earpiece jackYes—
Connectors2,5 und 3,5 mmUSB-C
Radios in the base pack—1
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare