AdvertiseGB · GBP
tech21two-way radios, compared
  1. tech21
  2. Compare
  3. BlueBound 350 vs IC-M25EURO EVO

Cobra BlueBound 350 vs Icom IC-M25EURO EVO

What BlueBound 350 does better (1) and where IC-M25EURO EVO wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Cobra BlueBound 350
Cobra · 2026BlueBound 350
6.5Score
1 advantage≈ £140
vs
Icom IC-M25EURO EVO
Icom · 2026IC-M25EURO EVO
6.9Score
1 advantage≈ £160
Higher score
6.5Ruggedness7.2
Dimensions

Size comparison

BlueBound 350IC-M25EURO EVO
255 × 665256 × 13431
BlueBound 350IC-M25EURO EVODifference
Height66 mm134 mm−68 mm
Width255 mm56 mm+199 mm
Depth52 mm31 mm+21 mm
Weight268 g228 g+40 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is BlueBound 350 better than IC-M25EURO EVO?

  1. Transmit power6 W vs 5 W+20%

Why is IC-M25EURO EVO better than BlueBound 350?

  1. Weight268 g vs 228 g+18%
Specifications

Side by side

Radio & range
Radio standardsAmateur VHF, Marine VHFAmateur VHF, Marine VHF
Frequency ranges156.025 - 163.275 MHz156 - 163.425 MHz
Transmit power6 W5 W
Channels215—
Squelchadjustable—
Power & battery
Battery capacity—1,570 mAh
Battery voltage7.4 V3.7 V
Power sourceRechargeable packRechargeable pack
USB-C charging—Yes
Battery level indicatorYesYes
Design & durability
Weight268 g228 g
Width255 mm56 mm
Height66 mm134 mm
Depth52 mm31 mm
Protection ratingIPX7IPX7
Water protection (IPx)IPx7IPx7
FloatsYes—
DisplayBacklit displayBacklit display
ColoursOrange, BlackBlue
Features
Channel scanYes—
Dual watch—Yes
Flashlight—Yes
Emergency / SOS alarmYes—
Key lockYes—
Roger beepYes—
Monitor button—Yes
Connectivity
Headset / earpiece jackYes—
Connectors—USB-C
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare