AdvertiseGB · GBP
tech21two-way radios, compared
  1. tech21
  2. Compare
  3. R-58 vs WT-320

DYNASCAN R-58 vs Simvalley Mobile WT-320

What R-58 does better (2) and where WT-320 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

DYNASCAN R-58
DYNASCAN · 2025R-58
7.8Score
2 advantages≈ £85
Higher score
vs
Simvalley Mobile WT-320
Simvalley Mobile · 2025WT-320
6.7Score
0 advantages≈ £60
8.4Range & power6.9
9.2Features3.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

R-58WT-320
115 × 553548 × 12828
R-58WT-320Difference
Height55 mm128 mm−73 mm
Width115 mm48 mm+67 mm
Depth35 mm28 mm+7 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is R-58 better than WT-320?

  1. Maximum range (claimed)12 km vs 10 km+20%
  2. Privacy codes (CTCSS / DCS)155 vs 384.1×

Why is WT-320 better than R-58?

WT-320 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

DYNASCAN R-58DYNASCAN R-58≈ £857.8
Radio & range
Radio standardsPMR446PMR446
LicenceLicence-freeLicence-free
Digital mode (DMR / dPMR)NoNo
Frequency ranges446 MHz446 MHz
Transmit power0.5 W0.5 W
Channels88
Maximum range (claimed)12 km10 km
Privacy codes (CTCSS / DCS)15538
CTCSS / DCS sub-tonesYesYes
Squelchadjustableautomatic
Call tones—10
Power & battery
Battery capacity1,600 mAh—
Battery voltage7.4 V—
Power sourceRechargeable packAA / AAA batteries
USB-C chargingNoNo
Battery level indicatorYesYes
Design & durability
Weight243 g—
Width115 mm48 mm
Height55 mm128 mm
Depth35 mm28 mm
Protection ratingIP67—
Water protection (IPx)IPx7—
DisplayBacklit displayBacklit display
ColoursBlackBlack
Features
VOX (hands-free)YesYes
Channel scanYes—
Flashlight—Yes
Emergency / SOS alarmYes—
FM radioYes—
Key lock—Yes
Roger beepYesYes
Voice encryption / scramblerYes—
PC programmableYes—
Connectivity
Headset / earpiece jackYesYes
Connectors2,5 und 3,5 mm2,5mm Klinke
Radios in the base pack14
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare