AdvertiseGB · GBP
tech21two-way radios, compared
  1. tech21
  2. Compare
  3. RL-300 vs BF 40

DYNASCAN RL-300 vs Stabo BF 40

What RL-300 does better (2) and where BF 40 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

DYNASCAN RL-300
DYNASCAN · 2026RL-300
6.0Score
2 advantages≈ £75
Higher score
vs
Stabo BF 40
Stabo · 2025BF 40
4.6Score
2 advantages≈ £100
6.9Range & power2.5
3.0Battery5.8
5.8Ruggedness3.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

RL-300BF 40
124 × 593757 × 11632
RL-300BF 40Difference
Height59 mm116 mm−57 mm
Width124 mm57 mm+67 mm
Depth37 mm32 mm+5 mm
Weight218 g168 g+50 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is RL-300 better than BF 40?

  1. Transmit power4 W vs 3 W+33%
  2. Water protection (IPx)IPx5 vs IPx4+25%

Why is BF 40 better than RL-300?

  1. Battery capacity1,800 mAh vs 2,200 mAh+22%
  2. Weight218 g vs 168 g+30%
Specifications

Side by side

DYNASCAN RL-300DYNASCAN RL-300≈ £756.0
Stabo BF 40Stabo BF 40≈ £1004.6
Radio & range
Radio standardsAmateur UHFAmateur UHF
LicenceBusiness licenceBusiness licence
Frequency ranges400 - 470 MHz400 - 470 MHz
Transmit power4 W3 W
Channels256256
Maximum range (claimed)12 km—
Privacy codes (CTCSS / DCS)—155
CTCSS / DCS sub-tonesYesYes
Squelchadjustableadjustable
Power & battery
Battery capacity1,800 mAh2,200 mAh
Battery voltage7.4 V3.7 V
Power sourceRechargeable packRechargeable pack
USB-C chargingNo—
Battery level indicatorYesYes
Design & durability
Weight218 g168 g
Width124 mm57 mm
Height59 mm116 mm
Depth37 mm32 mm
Protection ratingIP55IP54
Water protection (IPx)IPx5IPx4
DisplayBacklit display—
ColoursBlackBlack
Features
VOX (hands-free)Yes—
Channel scanYesYes
Dual watch—Yes
Emergency / SOS alarm—Yes
Roger beepYes—
Voice encryption / scramblerYes—
PC programmableYes—
Connectivity
Headset / earpiece jackYes—
Connectors2,5 und 3,5 mm—
Radios in the base pack1—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare