AdvertiseGB · GBP
tech21two-way radios, compared
  1. tech21
  2. Compare
  3. HT649 vs IC-M410BB

Entel HT649 vs Icom IC-M410BB

What HT649 does better (2) and where IC-M410BB wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Entel HT649
Entel · 2026HT649
8.7Score
2 advantages≈ £430
Higher score
vs
Icom IC-M410BB
Icom · 2026IC-M410BB
6.0Score
1 advantage≈ £670
8.4Ruggedness4.4
7.3Features7.3
Dimensions

Size comparison

HT649IC-M410BB
60 × 13037216 × 79113
HT649IC-M410BBDifference
Height130 mm79 mm+51 mm
Width60 mm216 mm−156 mm
Depth37 mm113 mm−76 mm
Weight277 g870 g−593 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is HT649 better than IC-M410BB?

  1. Weight277 g vs 870 g3.1×
  2. Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx7+14%

Why is IC-M410BB better than HT649?

  1. Transmit power1 W vs 25 W25×
Specifications

Side by side

Entel HT649Entel HT649≈ £4308.7
Icom IC-M410BBIcom IC-M410BB≈ £6706.0
Radio & range
Radio standardsAmateur VHF, Marine VHFAmateur VHF, Marine VHF
Frequency ranges156 - 163.275 MHz156.025 - 162 MHz
Transmit power1 W25 W
Squelch—adjustable
Power & battery
Battery voltage7.6 V12 V
Power sourceRechargeable packMains / 12 V vehicle
USB-C charging—No
Battery level indicatorYes—
Design & durability
Weight277 g870 g
Width60 mm216 mm
Height130 mm79 mm
Depth37 mm113 mm
Protection ratingIP68IPX7
Water protection (IPx)IPx8IPx7
Military standard (MIL-STD-810)Yes—
ShockproofYes—
DisplayBacklit displayBacklit display
ColoursYellowBlack
Features
VOX (hands-free)Yes—
Channel scanYesYes
Dual watch—Yes
Emergency / SOS alarmYesYes
Key lockYes—
Monitor buttonYes—
GPS—Yes
PC programmable—Yes
Connectivity
Headset / earpiece jackYesYes
Connectors—8‑polige Mikrofonbuchse
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare