AdvertiseGB · GBP
tech21two-way radios, compared
  1. tech21
  2. Compare
  3. HT649 vs IC-M85E

Entel HT649 vs Icom IC-M85E

What HT649 does better (1) and where IC-M85E wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Entel HT649
Entel · 2026HT649
9.0Score
1 advantage≈ £430
Higher score
vs
Icom IC-M85E
Icom · 2026IC-M85E
8.1Score
1 advantage≈ £300
8.5Ruggedness6.1
7.4Features3.7
Dimensions

Size comparison

HT649IC-M85E
60 × 1303792 × 5636
HT649IC-M85EDifference
Height130 mm56 mm+74 mm
Width60 mm92 mm−32 mm
Depth37 mm36 mm+1 mm
Weight277 g281 g−4 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is HT649 better than IC-M85E?

  1. Water protection (IPx)IPx8 vs IPx7+14%

Why is IC-M85E better than HT649?

  1. Transmit power1 W vs 5 W5×
Specifications

Side by side

Entel HT649Entel HT649≈ £4309.0
Icom IC-M85EIcom IC-M85E≈ £3008.1
Radio & range
Radio standardsAmateur VHF, Marine VHFAmateur VHF, Marine VHF
Licence—Business licence
Dual band (VHF + UHF)—Yes
Frequency ranges156 - 163.275 MHz156 - 163.425 MHz; 136 - 174 MHz
Transmit power1 W5 W
Channels—100
CTCSS / DCS sub-tones—Yes
Squelch—adjustable
Power & battery
Battery capacity—3,100 mAh
Battery voltage7.6 V7.2 V
Power sourceRechargeable packRechargeable pack
Battery level indicatorYesYes
Design & durability
Weight277 g281 g
Width60 mm92 mm
Height130 mm56 mm
Depth37 mm36 mm
Protection ratingIP68IP67
Water protection (IPx)IPx8IPx7
Military standard (MIL-STD-810)YesYes
ShockproofYesYes
DisplayBacklit displayBacklit display
ColoursYellowBlack
Features
VOX (hands-free)YesYes
VOX sensitivity levels—10
Channel scanYesYes
Dual watch—Yes
Emergency / SOS alarmYesYes
Key lockYesYes
Monitor buttonYesYes
Voice encryption / scrambler—Yes
PC programmable—Yes
Connectivity
Headset / earpiece jackYesYes
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare