AdvertiseGB · GBP
tech21two-way radios, compared
  1. tech21
  2. Compare
  3. VHF 315i vs Arctic

Garmin VHF 315i vs Midland Arctic

What VHF 315i does better (0) and where Arctic wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Garmin VHF 315i
Garmin · 2026VHF 315i
4.5Score
0 advantages≈ £610
vs
Midland Arctic
MidlandArctic
5.2Score
1 advantage
Higher score
7.3Features2.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

VHF 315iArctic
60 × 20518155 × 11537
VHF 315iArcticDifference
Height205 mm115 mm+90 mm
Width60 mm55 mm+5 mm
Depth181 mm37 mm+144 mm
Weight1,527 g230 g+1,297 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is VHF 315i better than Arctic?

VHF 315i has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is Arctic better than VHF 315i?

  1. Weight1,527 g vs 230 g6.6×
Specifications

Side by side

Garmin VHF 315iGarmin VHF 315i≈ £6104.5
Radio & range
Radio standardsAmateur VHF, Marine VHFMarine VHF
Frequency ranges156 - 162 MHz—
Transmit power25 W—
Squelchadjustableadjustable
Power & battery
Battery capacity—1,600 mAh
Battery voltage12 V—
Power sourceMains / 12 V vehicle—
Design & durability
Weight1,527 g230 g
Width60 mm55 mm
Height205 mm115 mm
Depth181 mm37 mm
Protection ratingIPX7—
Water protection (IPx)IPx7—
DisplayBacklit display—
ColoursBlack—
Features
VOX (hands-free)—Yes
VOX sensitivity levels—10
Channel scanYesYes
Dual watchYesYes
Emergency / SOS alarmYesYes
Key lock—Yes
GPSYes—
PC programmable—Yes
Connectivity
Headset / earpiece jackYesYes
Connectors—2 Pin Motorola
Radios in the base pack1—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare