AdvertiseGB · GBP
tech21two-way radios, compared
  1. tech21
  2. Compare
  3. IC-M410BB vs Arctic

Icom IC-M410BB vs Midland Arctic

What IC-M410BB does better (0) and where Arctic wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Icom IC-M410BB
Icom · 2026IC-M410BB
6.0Score
0 advantages≈ £670
Higher score
vs
Midland Arctic
MidlandArctic
5.2Score
1 advantage
7.3Features2.4
Dimensions

Size comparison

IC-M410BBArctic
216 × 7911355 × 11537
IC-M410BBArcticDifference
Height79 mm115 mm−36 mm
Width216 mm55 mm+161 mm
Depth113 mm37 mm+76 mm
Weight870 g230 g+640 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is IC-M410BB better than Arctic?

IC-M410BB has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is Arctic better than IC-M410BB?

  1. Weight870 g vs 230 g3.8×
Specifications

Side by side

Icom IC-M410BBIcom IC-M410BB≈ £6706.0
Radio & range
Radio standardsAmateur VHF, Marine VHFMarine VHF
Frequency ranges156.025 - 162 MHz—
Transmit power25 W—
Squelchadjustableadjustable
Power & battery
Battery capacity—1,600 mAh
Battery voltage12 V—
Power sourceMains / 12 V vehicle—
USB-C chargingNo—
Design & durability
Weight870 g230 g
Width216 mm55 mm
Height79 mm115 mm
Depth113 mm37 mm
Protection ratingIPX7—
Water protection (IPx)IPx7—
DisplayBacklit display—
ColoursBlack—
Features
VOX (hands-free)—Yes
VOX sensitivity levels—10
Channel scanYesYes
Dual watchYesYes
Emergency / SOS alarmYesYes
Key lock—Yes
GPSYes—
PC programmableYesYes
Connectivity
Headset / earpiece jackYesYes
Connectors8‑polige Mikrofonbuchse2 Pin Motorola
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare