AdvertiseGB · GBP
tech21two-way radios, compared
  1. tech21
  2. Compare
  3. XT50 Pro vs WT-320

Midland XT50 Pro vs Simvalley Mobile WT-320

What XT50 Pro does better (2) and where WT-320 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Midland XT50 Pro
Midland · 2025XT50 Pro
6.4Score
2 advantages≈ £65
vs
Simvalley Mobile WT-320
Simvalley Mobile · 2025WT-320
6.7Score
0 advantages≈ £60
Higher score
7.4Range & power6.9
5.5Features3.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

XT50 ProWT-320
102 × 493048 × 12828
XT50 ProWT-320Difference
Height49 mm128 mm−79 mm
Width102 mm48 mm+54 mm
Depth30 mm28 mm+2 mm

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is XT50 Pro better than WT-320?

  1. Channels85 vs 810.6×
  2. Privacy codes (CTCSS / DCS)121 vs 383.2×

Why is WT-320 better than XT50 Pro?

WT-320 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Midland XT50 ProMidland XT50 Pro≈ £656.4
Radio & range
Radio standardsPMR446PMR446
LicenceLicence-freeLicence-free
Digital mode (DMR / dPMR)NoNo
Frequency ranges446 MHz446 MHz
Transmit power0.5 W0.5 W
Channels858
Maximum range (claimed)—10 km
Privacy codes (CTCSS / DCS)12138
CTCSS / DCS sub-tonesYesYes
Squelch—automatic
Call tones—10
Power & battery
Battery capacity700 mAh—
Power sourceMains / 12 V vehicleAA / AAA batteries
USB-C charging—No
Battery level indicator—Yes
Design & durability
Weight94 g—
Width102 mm48 mm
Height49 mm128 mm
Depth30 mm28 mm
Protection ratingIPX2—
Water protection (IPx)IPx7—
DisplayBacklit displayBacklit display
ColoursBlueBlack
Features
VOX (hands-free)YesYes
VOX sensitivity levels6—
Channel scanYes—
Dual watchYes—
Flashlight—Yes
Weather channels / alertsYes—
Key lockYesYes
Roger beepYesYes
Connectivity
Headset / earpiece jackYesYes
Connectors2 Pin Midland2,5mm Klinke
Radios in the base pack24
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare