AdvertiseGB · GBP
tech21two-way radios, compared
  1. tech21
  2. Compare
  3. XT50 vs RT622

Midland XT50 vs Retevis RT622

What XT50 does better (1) and where RT622 wins (1) — every spec side by side.

Midland XT50
Midland · 2018XT50
3.8Score
1 advantage≈ £40
vs
Retevis RT622
Retevis · 2026RT622
5.6Score
1 advantage≈ £25
Higher score
6.2Range & power4.6
2.3Battery5.1

Why is XT50 better than RT622?

  1. Weight93 g vs 113 g+22%

Why is RT622 better than XT50?

  1. Battery capacity700 mAh vs 1,000 mAh+43%
Specifications

Side by side

Midland XT50Midland XT50≈ £403.8
Retevis RT622Retevis RT622≈ £255.6
Radio & range
Radio standardsPMR446PMR446
LicenceLicence-freeLicence-free
Digital mode (DMR / dPMR)NoNo
Frequency ranges446 MHz446 MHz
Transmit power0.5 W0.5 W
Channels16—
Maximum range (claimed)8 km—
Privacy codes (CTCSS / DCS)38—
CTCSS / DCS sub-tonesYes—
Squelch—adjustable
Power & battery
Battery capacity700 mAh1,000 mAh
Battery voltage—3.7 V
Power sourceAA / AAA batteriesRechargeable pack
Runs on AA/AAA batteries tooYes—
USB-C charging—Yes
Battery level indicator—Yes
Design & durability
Weight93 g113 g
Width54 mm—
Height103 mm—
Depth33 mm—
Shockproof—Yes
DisplayMonochrome display—
Features
VOX (hands-free)YesYes
VOX sensitivity levels3—
Channel scanYes—
Key lockYes—
Roger beepYes—
Connectivity
Headset / earpiece jackYesYes
Connectors2 Pin MidlandUSB-C, 2,5 und 3,5 mm
Radios in the base pack2—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare