AdvertiseGB · GBP
tech21two-way radios, compared
  1. tech21
  2. Compare
  3. Action Communicator vs BF 40

Milo Action Communicator vs Stabo BF 40

What Action Communicator does better (2) and where BF 40 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Milo Action Communicator
4.2Score
2 advantages≈ £160
vs
Stabo BF 40
Stabo · 2025BF 40
4.6Score
2 advantages≈ £100
Higher score
2.1Range & power2.5
7.4Ruggedness3.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

Action CommunicatorBF 40
74 × 662157 × 11632
Action CommunicatorBF 40Difference
Height66 mm116 mm−50 mm
Width74 mm57 mm+17 mm
Depth21 mm32 mm−11 mm
Weight72 g168 g−96 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is Action Communicator better than BF 40?

  1. Water protection (IPx)IPx7 vs IPx4+75%
  2. Weight72 g vs 168 g2.3×

Why is BF 40 better than Action Communicator?

  1. Transmit power0.5 W vs 3 W6×
  2. Channels8 vs 25632×
Specifications

Side by side

Stabo BF 40Stabo BF 40≈ £1004.6
Radio & range
Radio standards—Amateur UHF
Licence—Business licence
Frequency ranges446 MHz400 - 470 MHz
Transmit power0.5 W3 W
Channels8256
Privacy codes (CTCSS / DCS)—155
CTCSS / DCS sub-tones—Yes
Squelchautomaticadjustable
Power & battery
Battery capacity—2,200 mAh
Battery voltage—3.7 V
Power sourceRechargeable packRechargeable pack
USB-C chargingYes—
Battery level indicator—Yes
Design & durability
Weight72 g168 g
Width74 mm57 mm
Height66 mm116 mm
Depth21 mm32 mm
Protection ratingIP67IP54
Water protection (IPx)IPx7IPx4
ShockproofYes—
Colours—Black
Features
VOX (hands-free)Yes—
Channel scan—Yes
Dual watch—Yes
Emergency / SOS alarm—Yes
Weather channels / alertsYes—
Connectivity
Headset / earpiece jackYes—
Connectors3,5mm Klinke, USB-C—
BluetoothYes—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare