AdvertiseGB · GBP
tech21two-way radios, compared
  1. tech21
  2. Compare
  3. 813 vs MateTalk P64

NXGKET 813 vs Retevis MateTalk P64

What 813 does better (2) and where MateTalk P64 wins (0) — every spec side by side.

NXGKET 813
NXGKET · 2026813
7.2Score
2 advantages≈ £30
Higher score
vs
Retevis MateTalk P64
Retevis · 2026MateTalk P64
5.1Score
0 advantages≈ £35
6.2Range & power5.4
6.6Battery6.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

813MateTalk P64
30 × 60160110 × 5931
813MateTalk P64Difference
Height60 mm59 mm+1 mm
Width30 mm110 mm−80 mm
Depth160 mm31 mm+129 mm
Weight93 g158 g−65 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is 813 better than MateTalk P64?

  1. Weight93 g vs 158 g+70%
  2. DisplayBacklit display vs No display

Why is MateTalk P64 better than 813?

MateTalk P64 has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

NXGKET 813NXGKET 813≈ £307.2
Radio & range
Radio standardsPMR446PMR446
LicenceLicence-freeLicence-free
Digital mode (DMR / dPMR)NoNo
Frequency ranges446 MHz446 MHz
Transmit power0.5 W0.5 W
Channels1616
Maximum range (claimed)8 km—
CTCSS / DCS sub-tonesYes—
Squelchadjustable—
Call tones10—
Power & battery
Battery capacity1,200 mAh1,200 mAh
Battery voltage3.7 V3.7 V
Power sourceRechargeable packRechargeable pack
USB-C chargingYesYes
Standby time—46 h
Battery level indicatorYesYes
Design & durability
Weight93 g158 g
Width30 mm110 mm
Height60 mm59 mm
Depth160 mm31 mm
Protection rating—IP54
Water protection (IPx)—IPx4
ShockproofYes—
DisplayBacklit displayNo display
Colours—Black
Features
VOX (hands-free)YesYes
VOX sensitivity levels3—
Channel scanYesYes
FlashlightYes—
Emergency / SOS alarm—Yes
Key lockYes—
Monitor buttonYesYes
Noise reduction—Yes
PC programmable—Yes
Connectivity
Headset / earpiece jack—Yes
ConnectorsUSB-CUSB-C, 2,5 und 3,5 mm
Radios in the base pack3—
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare