AdvertiseGB · GBP
tech21two-way radios, compared
  1. tech21
  2. Compare
  3. RTM 100 vs HX320

Stabo RTM 100 vs Standard Horizon HX320

What RTM 100 does better (1) and where HX320 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Stabo RTM 100
Stabo · 2025RTM 100
3.8Score
1 advantage≈ £75
vs
Standard Horizon HX320
Standard Horizon · 2026HX320
8.3Score
2 advantages≈ £150
Higher score
2.2Battery7.7
8.2Ruggedness6.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

RTM 100HX320
63 × 11935133 × 6042
RTM 100HX320Difference
Height119 mm60 mm+59 mm
Width63 mm133 mm−70 mm
Depth35 mm42 mm−7 mm
Weight136 g290 g−154 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is RTM 100 better than HX320?

  1. Weight136 g vs 290 g2.1×

Why is HX320 better than RTM 100?

  1. Battery capacity850 mAh vs 2,100 mAh2.5×
  2. Transmit power3 W vs 6 W2×
Specifications

Side by side

Stabo RTM 100Stabo RTM 100≈ £753.8
Radio & range
Radio standardsAmateur VHF, Marine VHFAmateur VHF, Marine VHF
Frequency ranges156 - 163.425 MHz156.025 - 163.275 MHz
Transmit power3 W6 W
Squelchadjustableadjustable
Power & battery
Battery capacity850 mAh2,100 mAh
Battery voltage6 V7.4 V
Power sourceAA / AAA batteriesRechargeable pack
USB-C charging—Yes
Battery level indicatorYesYes
Design & durability
Weight136 g290 g
Width63 mm133 mm
Height119 mm60 mm
Depth35 mm42 mm
Protection ratingIPX7IPX7
Water protection (IPx)IPx7IPx7
Floats—Yes
DisplayBacklit displayBacklit display
ColoursBlackBlue
Features
VOX (hands-free)—Yes
VOX sensitivity levels—5
Channel scanYesYes
Dual watchYesYes
Flashlight—Yes
Emergency / SOS alarmYesYes
FM radio—Yes
Key lockYesYes
Monitor buttonYesYes
Noise reduction—Yes
PC programmable—Yes
Connectivity
Headset / earpiece jack—Yes
Connectors—USB-C, 3,5mm Klinke
Bluetooth—Yes
Radios in the base pack11
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare