Dimensions
Size comparison
PoC-AT1P50E PoC
| PoC-AT1 | P50E PoC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 50 mm | 61 mm | −11 mm |
| Width | 155 mm | 131 mm | +24 mm |
| Depth | 16 mm | 24 mm | −8 mm |
Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).
Why is PoC-AT1 better than P50E PoC?
PoC-AT1 has no measurable advantages in this pair.
Why is P50E PoC better than PoC-AT1?
- Battery capacity2,200 mAh vs 4,000 mAh+82%
Specifications
Side by side
| Radio & range | ||
| Radio standards | PoC / LTE | PoC / LTE |
| Licence | Needs mobile data (SIM) | Needs mobile data (SIM) |
| Push-to-talk over cellular (PoC) | Yes | Yes |
| Power & battery | ||
| Battery capacity | 2,200 mAh | 4,000 mAh |
| Power source | Rechargeable pack | Rechargeable pack |
| USB-C charging | Yes | Yes |
| Standby time | 96 h | — |
| Battery level indicator | Yes | Yes |
| Design & durability | ||
| Weight | 120 g | — |
| Width | 155 mm | 131 mm |
| Height | 50 mm | 61 mm |
| Depth | 16 mm | 24 mm |
| Protection rating | — | IP68 |
| Water protection (IPx) | — | IPx8 |
| Display | Backlit display | Backlit display |
| Colours | Grey | Black |
| Features | ||
| GPS | — | Yes |
| Connectivity | ||
| Headset / earpiece jack | Yes | Yes |
| Connectors | USB-C, 3,5mm Klinke | USB-C, microSD |
| Bluetooth | — | Yes |
| LTE / 4G | Yes | Yes |
| Wi-Fi | — | Yes |
| Radios in the base pack | 2 | 1 |
