AdvertiseGB · GBP
tech21two-way radios, compared
  1. tech21
  2. Compare
  3. IC-M25EURO EVO vs Arctic

Icom IC-M25EURO EVO vs Midland Arctic

What IC-M25EURO EVO does better (0) and where Arctic wins (0) — every spec side by side.

Icom IC-M25EURO EVO
Icom · 2026IC-M25EURO EVO
6.9Score
0 advantages≈ £160
Higher score
vs
Midland Arctic
MidlandArctic
5.2Score
0 advantages
5.9Battery4.5
Dimensions

Size comparison

IC-M25EURO EVOArctic
56 × 1343155 × 11537
IC-M25EURO EVOArcticDifference
Height134 mm115 mm+19 mm
Width56 mm55 mm+1 mm
Depth31 mm37 mm−6 mm
Weight228 g230 g−2 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is IC-M25EURO EVO better than Arctic?

IC-M25EURO EVO has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Why is Arctic better than IC-M25EURO EVO?

Arctic has no measurable advantages in this pair.

Specifications

Side by side

Radio & range
Radio standardsAmateur VHF, Marine VHFMarine VHF
Frequency ranges156 - 163.425 MHz—
Transmit power5 W—
Squelch—adjustable
Power & battery
Battery capacity1,570 mAh1,600 mAh
Battery voltage3.7 V—
Power sourceRechargeable pack—
USB-C chargingYes—
Battery level indicatorYes—
Design & durability
Weight228 g230 g
Width56 mm55 mm
Height134 mm115 mm
Depth31 mm37 mm
Protection ratingIPX7—
Water protection (IPx)IPx7—
DisplayBacklit display—
ColoursBlue—
Features
VOX (hands-free)—Yes
VOX sensitivity levels—10
Channel scan—Yes
Dual watchYesYes
FlashlightYes—
Emergency / SOS alarm—Yes
Key lock—Yes
Monitor buttonYes—
PC programmable—Yes
Connectivity
Headset / earpiece jack—Yes
ConnectorsUSB-C2 Pin Motorola
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare