AdvertiseGB · GBP
tech21two-way radios, compared
  1. tech21
  2. Compare
  3. IC-M25EURO EVO vs HX320

Icom IC-M25EURO EVO vs Standard Horizon HX320

What IC-M25EURO EVO does better (1) and where HX320 wins (2) — every spec side by side.

Icom IC-M25EURO EVO
Icom · 2026IC-M25EURO EVO
6.9Score
1 advantage≈ £160
vs
Standard Horizon HX320
Standard Horizon · 2026HX320
8.3Score
2 advantages≈ £150
Higher score
5.9Battery7.7
7.2Ruggedness6.1
Dimensions

Size comparison

IC-M25EURO EVOHX320
56 × 13431133 × 6042
IC-M25EURO EVOHX320Difference
Height134 mm60 mm+74 mm
Width56 mm133 mm−77 mm
Depth31 mm42 mm−11 mm
Weight228 g290 g−62 g

Drawn to the same scale from the official dimensions (front and side).

Why is IC-M25EURO EVO better than HX320?

  1. Weight228 g vs 290 g+27%

Why is HX320 better than IC-M25EURO EVO?

  1. Battery capacity1,570 mAh vs 2,100 mAh+34%
  2. Transmit power5 W vs 6 W+20%
Specifications

Side by side

Radio & range
Radio standardsAmateur VHF, Marine VHFAmateur VHF, Marine VHF
Frequency ranges156 - 163.425 MHz156.025 - 163.275 MHz
Transmit power5 W6 W
Squelch—adjustable
Power & battery
Battery capacity1,570 mAh2,100 mAh
Battery voltage3.7 V7.4 V
Power sourceRechargeable packRechargeable pack
USB-C chargingYesYes
Battery level indicatorYesYes
Design & durability
Weight228 g290 g
Width56 mm133 mm
Height134 mm60 mm
Depth31 mm42 mm
Protection ratingIPX7IPX7
Water protection (IPx)IPx7IPx7
Floats—Yes
DisplayBacklit displayBacklit display
ColoursBlueBlue
Features
VOX (hands-free)—Yes
VOX sensitivity levels—5
Channel scan—Yes
Dual watchYesYes
FlashlightYesYes
Emergency / SOS alarm—Yes
FM radio—Yes
Key lock—Yes
Monitor buttonYesYes
Noise reduction—Yes
PC programmable—Yes
Connectivity
Headset / earpiece jack—Yes
ConnectorsUSB-CUSB-C, 3,5mm Klinke
Bluetooth—Yes
Radios in the base pack—1
To compare: 0up to 4 models
Compare